RANKINGS
______________________________________________________________
1. White Warlord - Score = 💀 1/2 - One and a Half Skulls
Attempts to Beat: 1
Well, that was disappointing. The "Combat Heroes" series by author Joe Dever of "Lone Wolf" fame, is designed for two-players, but also has a solo game included with it, and as with other two-player series that have such a component (like "Clash of the Princes"), I will be reviewing just strictly the solo portion. And if the solo adventure is any indication, I hope for the sake of those playing the two-player game that it's much better than this. The story here, oh boy. Could this be any thinner? In this first book you play as the White Warlord, ruler of the realm of Kordan, and are in constant competition with your arch-rival, the Black Baron of Zorn, to see who can kill the other and presumably take over their lands. Within the major neutral city of Jakor, there dwells a famous maze-master who proposes a contest between yourself and the Black Baron, to see which of you can survive his deadly maze, and with a prize of 50,000 gold pieces to the victor. You accept the challenge, as does the Black Baron, but on your way to Jakor you are abducted by the Black Baron's men, and thrown in a deadly maze of the Baron's construction. So hang on, we were travelling towards a challenge in a maze, are kidnapped en route, then dropped in a different maze? The inhabitants of this world sure must have a fetish for mazes. And of course the usual question of "why didn't your arch-enemy just kill you outright?" presents itself as well, which proves to be even more of a puzzler in this case seeing as how easy his maze ended up being to solve.
This is a dice-less gamebook and only gives you one stat to keep track of, that being your Endurance points of which you begin the game with 30. Before being dropped in the maze, you are also told what you will need to do in order to escape. There are 9 treasures located throughout the maze, which must all be located before you can leave. The catch is that each treasure can only be opened by one of the other treasures. You are given a Silver Disc before you begin, which will open one of the treasures, and the treasure you obtain there will open one of the others etc, etc. So in other words you need to locate all the treasure locations, and also determine the exact order in which they need to be opened. Each treasure has a riddle inscribed on it which gives a clue as to what item will open it, but these riddles are pretty weak, and include lines such as "smooth as glass, and green as grass", and it did seem to me that whether you already have the required item or not is usually clear, as each of the treasures are quite distinct. The item in question for the above riddle is an emerald, and if you don't have the emerald yet, nothing else comes close to this description so you know to not even try any of your other items, which if you choose incorrectly results in a minor Endurance point loss. Uncovering the locations of the treasures is not hard at all, because the layout of the maze is very small and cramped, and many times you only have to turn a few corners to find another one. The maze itself is also shockingly devoid of anything interesting with empty passageways everywhere, and how is it that a series called "Combat Heroes" has NO combat in it?
There are only two different kinds of things you can uncover in the maze, either treasures or traps. The treasures you obviously want to find, but there are also traps scattered throughout the maze which you can trigger should you pass through certain passageways going in a certain direction. These traps include things such as spears shooting out of the walls, or a poison gas cloud spraying you in the face, and cost you some Endurance points. Once you have triggered them once however, they are easily avoidable after that, and thankfully none of them cause instant death (that I found anyway). You recover some Endurance points when you successfully open one of the treasures, and without this I probably wouldn't have beaten the adventure on my first try. I got down as low as 3 Endurance at one point due to triggering various traps as I randomly wandered through the maze, so one more trap likely would have polished me off. However by this point I had now learned the locations of all the treasures and began opening them in order, recovering more and more Endurance as I did so, and ended the game with my Endurance total at 25. There is a scoring system provided at the end, where you compare how many Endurance points you have remaining to get a ranking, and my total of 25 granted me the highest ranking attainable, that of "Expert Survivor". Even if I had died on this first attempt, I would have easily been able to blow through the maze on my second go, so as long as you make a map, the challenge level here is quite low.
Speaking of the layout of the maze, this is one of those adventures that can initially be confusing to map out, because the section number for each passageway will be different depending upon which direction you are facing, making it tougher to locate areas you haven't been to yet. However, I quickly figured out to map using the section numbers and also used directional arrows on my map, and didn't have too much trouble after that, although because you are never given the distance of the passageways you are travelling down, my map didn't always quite link up, as it can be hard to tell how far you have walked just going off the illustrations. Ah yes the illustrations. With very little text descriptions here, the adventure relies upon an illustration of each passageway you travel down in order to create atmosphere, but fails abysmally here as the drawings are very small and undetailed, with never anything of interest going on in them. Even when you spring a trap, you are met with a cartoonish drawing such as a scythe coming out of a wall for instance, which I'm surprised didn't contain the world "SLASH!" in big bold letters on the page. Every so often you will come across a passageway where one of the options as to which way to go has an "x" in front of it, and when that happens you turn to the corresponding line entry at the back of the book. (ie. x78 would have you checking out line 78) and this is usually where you are sent when you locate a treasure. So while there is SOME text here, these lines are very brief and do not pick up any of the slack left over by the lackluster illustrations.
One other thing to note, make sure you don't get caught out starting the solo game on the wrong section as I initially did. Somewhat buried in the rules for the solo quest, it is mentioned that this game mode begins on section 7. So if after having read the rest of the rules, this fact has slipped from your mind, you could find yourself beginning on section 1 (being used to always starting at 1) and inadvertently find yourself playing the two-player game for 10 or so minutes before you wonder what the hell is going on and why nothing seems to be making much sense, at which point you go back to the rules and figure out your mistake. Ok, so maybe I was the only one who made this error, but I thought I would call it out just in case. Finally, the sections used for the solo game are different in terms of game-play (with different icons at the bottom of the page as opposed to the two-player sections), so each section in the book is therefore dedicated to one game or the other. Strangely then, the pages for both the solo and two-player games are intermingled with one another. It could have cut down on the page flipping somewhat if the different games had just been kept separate, and the only reason I can think of for doing it this way is to make each game mode seem longer than it really is.
Ranking: This felt like a waste of time. I have to believe the solo quest was included just as a cash grab so they could put "for either 1 or 2 players" on the front and market it to the solo crowd as well. If I had bought this purely for the solo content, I would have felt rightly ripped off. (Hang on....that IS what I bought it for. D'oh!) The "riddles" and determining in which order to open the treasures is the only remote reason for even playing this, and even that can frustrate when you have to weave back and forth through the same corridors to collect everything step-by-step. Even though this is not a magazine adventure, I have decided to use the "Skull Ranking" system, as there is not enough meat here to compare it to other full-length gamebooks. No story development, no encounters (save for a ghost right at the exit), and no combats. My goodness, are all the solo quests in this series going to be like this? If so, perhaps this should be called the "No Combat and Lame Heroes" series, although "Treasures and Traps" would have been a more appropriate and realistic title with a better ring to it.
______________________________________________________________
2. Black Baron - Score = 💀 1/2 - One and a Half Skulls
Attempts to Beat: 1
This is going to be a short review, because this is essentially the same gamebook as the previous one. Here we play as the Black Baron of Zorn, who like our counterpart from the first book, accepts the maze-master's challenge and sets off for the city of Jakor. On the way he is captured by the White Warlord's men, and is thrown into a maze to presumably die, unless he can find the 9 treasures hidden within and escape yadda yadda yadda. Original eh?
I finished this quest several days before beginning to write this post because I didn't know what the hell I was going to talk about, and I am already struggling to say much here, as the only differences from this adventure and the first book are very minor. The layout of the maze is switched up (although not as much as you might expect when comparing my two maps side-by-side), the 9 treasures are different, as are the "riddles" that are provided as to the order in which the treasures need to be unlocked, and that's about it. One final difference I noticed was that this adventure felt even easier than the first one, as at least in that one I came close to death by getting down to 3 Endurance at one point, but here the lowest my Endurance score ever dipped was 13, before I then started unlocking the treasures and the score began climbing again. I believe this is because, for some unknown reason, there are a handful of traps that cause NO damage when you trigger them. What the heck was the point of them then? I actually came across five traps such as these as I explored the maze (while I believe I only came across one such trap in the first book that caused no damage). As such, I again finished with the highest possible score ranking when I exited the maze, also once again doing so on my first attempt. And also once again, there were no combats, no encounters, no story.
When beginning this book, I was fully expecting it to be very much like the previous one, and therefore wasn't surprised to find that indeed was the case. But as I was playing, it occurred to me.....why did it have to be this way? I mean, for the two-player game the adventures in both books needed to be the same, I get that. But for the solo games, why couldn't the two adventures have been completely different? For example, the Black Baron could have had his ship caught in a storm as he travelled to Jakor, and found himself shipwrecked on a deadly island that he needed to escape from. For that matter, neither of the two solo adventures needed to take place in mazes, because that was what the two player game was for. This could have lead to some nice character development for each of them if they both had their own distinct adventures, and could have made the two-player game feel more personal if you played the solo quest with your chosen character first. Instead, it turns out that both the White Warlord and the Black Baron have the EXACT same plan to deal with the other, right down to the 9 treasures and riddles! That seems so incredibly unlikely that I was half expecting some great twist, where it is eventually revealed that the White Warlord and the Black Baron were in fact the same person, and they suffered from some sort of split-personality disorder that had him constantly at war with himself. But alas, I guess it's just supposed to be a fantastic coincidence.
Destined to battle for all eternity. These books would have made more sense as Spy-vs-Spy gamebooks.
Ranking: I don't feel that I have much choice but to give this the same score as the first book, because if you have played that book, then you have for all intents and purposes played this as well. I give the tiebreaker to the White Warlord book, just because it felt slightly more "difficult". On to the next pair of books in the series, and at least it appears that Joe Dever has chosen a couple of more interesting colours for these next two if nothing else, and a Christmassy combination of colours at that.
______________________________________________________________
3. Emerald Enchanter - Score = 💀 💀 - Two Skulls
Attempts to Beat: 4
______________________________________________________________
4. Scarlet Sorcerer - Score = 💀 1/2 - One and a Half Skulls
Attempts to Beat: 4
Another short review here, because as it turns out, very put off is exactly what I ended up being. All the author did here is paste the same introduction and prologue in, then crossed out Emerald Enchanter and substituted in the name Scarlet Sorcerer instead. You play as the character of the title, star pupil of Silvarion the Great, whose former star pupil Ralagon has defected to the side of evil and poured his energy into the POWER CRYS-.....oh screw it, I'm not doing that anymore. There are only a few differences in this adventure from the previous, these being:
- you begin in a different hometown, on the complete opposite side of the world map (and the world map is exactly the same as before)
- the poem you are given at the beginning that provides clues as to what items you will need is different (because what you need to find is slightly different this time)
- whereas in the previous adventure you needed to find two items, along with the power crystal itself, here you only need to find ONE item that will allow you to access the crystal. As if the introduction wasn't lazy enough, this is brutal
- the item you need along with the power crystal are hidden in different locations this time (thank goodness, or this would have been incredibly lame)
So yeah, if you have already played Emerald Enchanter, this isn't exactly thrilling stuff. The difficulty level on the surface seemed to be about the same, as despite having one less item to find, it took me the same amount of attempts to complete (thanks to several random insta-deaths). That said, after completing this quest and looking at my map, the layout does make it look much easier. In the previous book, having that one extra item to find makes a world of difference, because it had me thoroughly exploring the map. The previous book also laid its required items out in such a way that you had to zig-zag and double back a couple of times to do everything in the correct order. But here, the one item you need to find before you can get the power crystal is located mere steps away from your starting hometown, and you are even provided a hint about which direction to take to get there before setting out. I could just have easily beaten this adventure on my second or third attempt had I not been curious and investigated everything in most areas I entered, which is what adventuring is supposed to be about.
I did come across something puzzling in one of the locations, in that I ran into my rival, the Emerald Enchanter, who was also seeking the power crystal. Instead of doing the sensible thing and joining forces for the good of the continent, (or even just deciding to put our animosity on hold and let each other continue searching for the crystal) we decide that our petty rivalry takes precedence, and attack each other instead. The book then gave me the option of resolving our encounter using the two player game. I didn't have this meeting while playing the previous adventure, although it could have been in there somewhere. But the thing is, if I had a friend available to play the two player game, wouldn't I likely be doing that already? I wonder how many readers playing the solo game actually went and found someone willing to play the two player game just to resolve this encounter. Seems like a heck of a lot of trouble to go to just to "move on" in the adventure, which the book allows you to do solo should you wish to anyway.
Ranking: Basically the same adventure as Emerald Enchanter, except lazier. Once again I feel like there is no reason why these solo adventures needed to be repeated in each pair of books, and why they couldn't have been completely unique. While I liked the story and idea behind the latter pair of books better than the initial pair, the design and layout of Scarlet Sorcerer in particular felt so half-assed that out of all the adventures, I found this one to be the least fun, and therefore have it at the bottom of the rankings. Yet another final adventure in a series to meet that fate. The series as a whole was extremely hampered by an almost total lack of atmosphere, interesting story developments, or fun game mechanics, and I feel my initial thoughts about the solo games being included as a "tack on" just to sell more books was justified.
I wasn't expecting another review so soon but welcome nonetheless ! Although i never played this series, it always struck me as being distinctly so-so and your review has now confirmed it.
ReplyDeleteDoesn't take long when the adventure is this short and you beat it first try! I might get through this whole series in less time than just one of the Catacombs books.
DeleteThe two-player game is no improvement (and if you take the time to map the setting, you'll wonder how the maze-master dared to call it a maze).
ReplyDeleteIIRC, the solo adventures in the second pair of Combat Heroes books are better than those in Black Baron and White Warlord. Still nothing special, but the puzzle-solving is marginally more challenging, and the time limit increases the likelihood of your needing to play more than once.
I was hoping to get to ask you if the two-player game is any better, so thank you for letting me know. I hope the second pair of books provides at least some challenge, because Black Baron proved to be even easier than White Warlord.
DeleteThanks for your reliably insightful thoughts, John! I've owned all four of these for a while now (I bought them back in the days when you didn't need to remortgage to afford a gamebook), and they have so far sat in a drawer unread. Despite the rave reviews they received in Warlock, they've just never really appealed. Your review suggests that my prejudices are possibly correct in this case...
ReplyDeleteThanks Ben. If you ever get around to playing them, I would be interested as to what you think. Just because I don't enjoy a gamebook doesn't mean others might not, so you never know!
DeleteYou might be right, and perhaps I should dig them out for a spin. I think they suffer a bit (for me anyway) because the image-heavy format was handled so much more excitingly by Pat Mills in the fantastic Diceman series. Speaking of which, did you know that the Ronald Reagan 'adventure' got a spin-off in 1987, when Emerson and Mills teamed up again for a book-length take-down of Margaret Thatcher? Same tone, same delirious art-style, but it manages to be even MORE scurrilous than the Reagan one.
DeleteThe two-player game here is also an improvement on the first one, though still not that great.There's not a lot to it, really, but it does what it does pretty well.
ReplyDeleteMost significantly, it's a good deal more tactical than BB/WW. In the first pair of books you're likely to spend a lot of time wandering around the 'maze' (or skulking behind part of the scenery) and hoping to spot your opponent before (or at least at the same time as) they catch sight of you. It almost all comes down to luck, whereas in these books, you're usually aware of where your opponent is, and the strategy lies in trying to anticipate and counter whatever move they're about to make, while they attempt to do likewise with you.
I've rarely played the two-player game of BB/WW, and what attempts I did make at it were often abandoned unfinished, but back in the eighties I enjoyed many EE/SS battles with different friends.
Good to have some feedback on the two player game for the second pair of books as well. As I played through the solo game of Emerald Enchanter I was obviously catching a lot of glimpses of the two player game and often found myself stopping to check out some of the sections, as they looked very interesting due to the airship controls, and you seem to have a heck of a lot of options as to your next move. Can't say I was ever tempted to check out any of the two player sections when playing through the solo game of the first two books. They looked very bland (not that the solo game was any better) which I'm assuming is why you would abandon it.
DeleteI always suspected this series would be a bit crap. Guess I was right! Sure you're glad to be done with it. Are you headed back to the Catacombs next?
ReplyDeleteAt least this series didn't take very long to finish! I think I will leave the last two Catacombs books for the summer. For now I am about to start another two-player series with a solo component, "Double Game". Although I just noticed that Sutherland and Farrell are the authors, which doesn't inspire a ton of confidence based on the last series of theirs I played. I will give it a fair shot though.
DeleteJohn Blanche did the cover art for some of the Double Game series. Not sure about the content though.
ReplyDelete